Don't Fear The Ai Reaper: A LinkedIN Post

The Fear of Ai Will Eat You Alive

by Greg Walters

From a LinkedIn post by, Ravit Dotan, PhD, November 22, 2023.  

"Hot take: ChatGPT is not that useful. With the current OpenAI storm increasing the hype, now is a great time to question it.

➤ Background
👉More often than companies like OpenAI want to admit, generative AI is the wrong tool for the job.
👉It is time to admit that, often, generative AI is a hammer looking for a nail.
👉Here are two examples from my own work.

➤ Summarizing text
😕Using generative AI to summarize text never works well for me because the summaries fail to reflect what I think is important in the text.
😕The cause is that summarizing text is not a technical task. It requires decisions on what is important, which depends on context and values.
😕Can you put the context and values into the prompt? Maybe sometimes. But that hasn't worked well in my case, and the attempts take longer than just summarizing the text myself.
​
➤ First drafts, brainstorming, and outlining
😕This is the worst use of generative AI for me. The output is usually banal. But the main problem is that it constrains my thinking and wastes time.
😕Writing the first draft is sensitive work because it shapes how you think about the project. It's difficult to recover from a bad first draft because it's difficult to re-imagine what you've already imagined.
😕Can you solve the problem with better prompt engineering? Maybe sometimes. But when the task is to articulate a thought baking in your mind, generative AI can lead you astray. It gives you a mesh of other people's thoughts and that can drown your own.

​➤ All of this is not to say that generative AI is useless.
👉I do think it's a revolutionary technology with many helpful applications, including in my own work. For example, the image in the banner below is AI-generated!
👉But the usefulness is not to the extent that companies like OpenAI would have us believe.
​
➤ Comments very welcome! hashtag#aiethics hashtag#responsibleai hashtag#openai"

Of course, I had to respond.  My LinkedIn comment:

"Desperation is not attractive."  
​
Your observations tell more about the current status of Human Intelligence vs. Ai.
- when are these NOT concerns?

---

"...summaries fail to reflect what I think is important in the text..."
"...it shapes how you think about the project..."
"...It requires decisions on what is important..."
"...hasn't worked well in my case, and the attempts take longer than just summarizing the text myself..."
"...it constrains my thinking and wastes time..."
"... it's difficult to re-imagine what you've already imagined..."
"...gives you a mesh of other people's thoughts and that can drown your own..." ​

I asked ChatGPT, "considering the first set of objections, how does my response stand up?"

​The LLM reply is delicious.

​The response:

​"Desperation is not attractive" juxtaposed with the concerns raised about AI's limitations highlights a nuanced understanding of the interaction between human intelligence and AI. It suggests that the effectiveness of AI tools like ChatGPT is significantly influenced by the user's approach, self-awareness, and critical thinking skills.

Let's break down the concerns and align them with this perspective:

"...summaries fail to reflect what I think is important in the text...":
This reflects the challenge of aligning AI's understanding with individual subjective perspectives. AI's performance can improve with more precise input, showcasing the importance of clear and thoughtful prompt engineering. 

"...it shapes how you think about the project...":
The concern here is about AI influencing or limiting creative thought. However, this can also be seen as an opportunity for users to critically engage with AI-generated content, using it as a basis for further development rather than a final solution.

"...It requires decisions on what is important...":
This is a testament to the collaborative nature of AI and human interaction. AI can present information, but the user's critical thinking is crucial in determining its relevance and importance.

"...hasn't worked well in my case...":
Personal experiences with AI can vary widely, often reflecting the user's skill in utilizing the technology effectively.

"...it constrains my thinking and wastes time...":
This perception can change with a deeper understanding of AI's capabilities and limitations. Users who view AI as a tool to augment, rather than replace, their thinking might find it more beneficial.

"...difficult to re-imagine what you've already imagined...":
This underscores the importance of open-mindedness when interacting with AI. Users who are flexible in their thinking may find AI more useful.

"...gives you a mesh of other people's thoughts...":
This concern points to the need for critical evaluation of AI output, using it as a source of inspiration or a different perspective rather than a definitive answer.

The effectiveness of AI tools like ChatGPT greatly depends on how they are used.

​They require a blend of self-awareness, critical thinking, and a balanced approach towards the technology. Users who can skillfully navigate these aspects may find AI to be a powerful ally in various tasks.

The lessons in this example?  There are a few:

Ai is a reflection of human imperfections, not a replacement for our imperfections.
To truly adopt and excel, one must overcome Fear; this is commonly known as Courage.
Challenges that you, or a learned professor of a distinguished higher education institution, are yours and yours alone.  Especially in the Age of Ai, there are no experts, professors or mentors - we are all on the same educational level and the same plane of awareness.

Boldly go.  

"AI ἀναρχία"
​
​

---